Confidence intervals: read the uncertainty
Read confidence intervals with attention to sample base, method, and uncertainty. Check what their width and overlap can establish in research.
UXTap Journal Research, product & people
Better questions.
New discoveries.
Methods, examples and research decisions for people who want to understand users before designing their next experience.
54 articles for your next studyExplore the library
Featured read 01
AnalysisConfidence intervals: read the uncertainty
Read confidence intervals with attention to sample base, method, and uncertainty. Check what their width and overlap can establish in research.
Read the articleA growing research library
From method to practice.
54 articles
Missing responses: uncover why data is absent
Distinguish optional questions, routing, dropout, and technical failures when reviewing missing responses. Record known reasons and uncertainty.
Extreme times: investigate before excluding
Investigate extreme task times before excluding responses. Review session evidence, measurement limits, and results with and without flagged cases.
Distinguishing study abandonment and task failure
Separate task outcomes, session status, and technical incidents, with examples and criteria for documenting the denominator of each research measure.
Order Effect: How Task Sequence Impacts Usability
Review the order of independent tasks and dependent flows, recording the sequence and avoiding comparison between trained and new participants.
Realistic dummy data for usability testing
Check coherent examples of fictional data across screens and values, with varied names and sizes, using synthetic data and test accounts.
Prototype Fidelity: What Needs to Be Real
Review prototype fidelity based on the research question, such as state recovery or final text, documenting limitations in the findings.
Researching tables and dashboards for priority decisions
Check the decision on delivery priority from a table, observing confusion between filter and missing data, sorting, and data export.
Permission Requests: Test Context and Refusal
Check permission requests for camera or location in a safe scenario, understanding purpose and alternatives when refusing, without addressing legal compliance.
Test Cancellation with the Same Care as Sign-Up
Compare pausing, downgrading, and canceling a subscription in a hypothetical scenario, distinguishing billing and access consequences without actual cancellation.
Researching Trust Before Purchase Completion
Check the clarity of the total, deadline, next steps, and conditions in a simulated scenario, separating declared confidence from observed behavior.
Navigation labels: find ambiguities
Review plausible categories for the same need, such as Payments and Financial, exploring expectations before choosing the navigation solution.
Internal Search: Test Intentions, Not Just Keywords
Check how participants formulate queries based on needs, testing synonyms and lack of results, recording context and result evaluation.
Empty States: Research the First Step
Check the first visit, no search results, restrictive filter, and loading failure, asking what the user expects to do in each empty state.
Forms: Test error recovery
Review error recovery in forms, testing scenarios of invalid values, correction, and return, observing if the participant understands the message.
How to research experiences with unstable connections
Compare network failures, state loss, and incomprehensible messages when researching experiences with unstable connections, using controlled simulations.
Assistive technology research: prepare your session
Review how to prepare research sessions with assistive technologies, asking about needs and usual equipment, testing materials and compatibility.
Remote Tech Rehearsal: Beyond the Camera Check
Check how a remote technical rehearsal tests invitations, audio, sharing, observers, links, alternative plans, and limits for session interruption.
When to Stay Silent in Usability Testing
Review when to remain silent in usability tests, avoiding rescue before observation and defining intervention criteria for discomfort or blocking.
Research Notes: Separate Observation from Interpretation
Compare observations and interpretations in research notes, distinguishing behavior, literal speech, and hypotheses, like a participant returning to an address field.
Research Incentives: Organize Your Operation
Check how to organize research incentives, defining deadlines, support channels, and rules for early termination or technical failures, independent of product praise.
Screen participants without revealing desired answers
Review how to craft screening questions about recent behavior and balanced alternatives, avoiding the revelation of desired roles or usage ranges.
Moderated or Unmoderated Testing: Choose by the Question
Compare the need for real-time depth with application consistency when choosing between moderated or unmoderated tests, such as for delivery renegotiations.
Research Pilot: Test Your Study Before Recruiting
Check how a pilot run with colleagues distinguishes prototype bugs, ambiguous instructions, and duration, without generating target audience evidence.
UXTap vs Useberry: from prototype fidelity to design decision
Compare integrations, tasks, recordings, and analysis without confusing prototype failure with a usability problem. Includes a roadmap for orders and delivery.
UXTap vs Maze: prototypes, interviews, and research operations
How to evaluate UXTap and Maze from the first test to the evidence archive: methods, recruitment, analysis, total cost, and a migration that preserves context.
UXTap vs Lyssna: choose between impression, preference, and behavior
A comparison for teams that need to validate messages and navigation. Understand methods, recruitment, prototypes, recordings, and what each result allows you to conclude.
UXTap vs Hotjar: Task Testing and Website Analysis with Contentsquare
When to observe visitors, when to invite participants, and how to combine evidence. See the current Hotjar/Contentsquare offering, instrumentation, and historical data considerations.
Tree testing: test navigation before designing the menu
Assess whether people find information through structure and labels, using clear tasks and careful path analysis.
Usability testing in Figma: from prototype to useful evidence
Prepare tasks, connections, and success criteria so that Figma testing reveals experience difficulties and produces clear decisions.
First Click Test: Discover Where the Task Begins
Learn how to use the first click to evaluate action discoverability and interpret chosen regions without extrapolating the result.
Preference Test: Compare Alternatives with a Clear Question
Discover how to prepare comparable versions, ask for justifications, and use stated preference without confusing it with ease of use.
Content Testing: Discover What Text Allows You to Understand and Do
Investigate doubts in texts and screens, ask for concrete explanations, and transform markings into revisions that can be validated.
Five-second test: what your page can communicate
Use a brief exposure to investigate recall and understanding of the message, with questions that do not reveal what should have been perceived.
Tag or extension: how to prepare a test on a real website
Choose the instrumentation based on website access, audience device, and the visual evidence needed to analyze the task.
SUS: how to use the usability scale without confusing the score
Understand the SUS structure, result calculation, and necessary precautions to compare versions without losing the experience context.
Research Repository: Make Findings Survive the Presentation
Organize evidence, tags, and interpretations to retrieve previous learnings and decide when a finding needs to be reviewed.
Session Replays: Find Evidence Without Aimlessly Watching Everything
Organize session review by research question and differentiate between video, event-based reconstruction, and behavior interpretation.
UX Executive Report: Show the Decision and Necessary Evidence
Organize a report that explains the problem, the strength of the evidence, and the next action without losing methodological context.
Continuous research: transform recurring feedback into small decisions
Plan when to invite, what to ask, and how to review signals to maintain a product-linked learning routine.
SaaS Onboarding: test the path to the first useful outcome
Investigate the beginning of the experience through the customer's objective and discover which steps help or hinder reaching a relevant outcome.
NPS: how to calculate, interpret, and investigate what's behind it
Understand the NPS formula and build an interpretation that preserves the distribution of scores, context, and reported reasons.
Maze, Useberry, Lyssna or Hotjar: how to choose your research tool
A guide to move beyond the feature list and decide based on the work: method, material, audience, evidence, total cost, and continuity. Includes UXTap in the evaluation.
User journey map: connect paths to opportunities
Build a journey with purpose, context, and evidence, distinguishing the path between screens from the broader user experience.
Conditional logic: show the right question to each participant
Design understandable branches, test all paths, and keep denominators clear when analyzing questions seen by different audiences.
AI Interview in UX: Prepare the Script and Review the Evidence
Use AI-driven interviews to explore experiences with real people, maintaining objectives, boundaries, and reviewing interpretations.
CSAT vs CES: when to measure satisfaction and when to measure effort
Choose the metric according to the experience you want to investigate and keep the scale, timing, and calculation clear to interpret the result.
Quotas and Recruitment: Form a Useful Sample for the Question
Differentiate screening, sample composition, and response limits to recruit relevant people without confusing quantity with quality.
Compare Versions: Discover if the Change Improved the Experience
Prepare a comparison with consistent tasks, audiences, and criteria, distinguishing observed difference from evidence about the effect of the change.
How to plan UX research that ends in a decision
A lean plan to define the question, choose the method, recruit the audience, and agree on how the team will use the results.
How to write usability tasks without giving away the path
Transform research objectives into clear scenarios, with sufficient context and success criteria that don't give away the answer.
How to analyze a heatmap without turning clicks into assumptions
Learn to read click maps with task, device, and session context, avoiding conclusions that the visualization does not support.
Card sorting: discover how people organize their content
Plan cards and categories, read the groupings, and transform patterns into a testable architecture proposal.
Open-ended responses with AI: organize themes without losing people's voices
Combine automatic grouping, response reading, and human review to transform free text into useful product evidence.
Now, try it.
A good read.
A better question.
Put the method to work in your product. Create your first UXTap study.
Create my first study Free · 1 study · 50 responses/month · no card